{"id":100617,"date":"2025-04-09T08:14:16","date_gmt":"2025-04-09T06:14:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/?p=100617"},"modified":"2025-04-04T13:07:53","modified_gmt":"2025-04-04T11:07:53","slug":"riedel-replaces-aluminium-bottles-with-cardboard-packaging-from-sig","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/riedel-ersetzt-alu-flaschen-durch-kartonverpackungen-von-sig\/","title":{"rendered":"Riedel replaces aluminium bottles with cardboard packaging from SIG"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dutch juice producer Riedel is switching its \u201eVan de Boom\u201c fruit syrup brand to carton packaging from SIG.<\/p>\n<p>Riedel, a producer of fruit drinks in the Netherlands, has announced that it will no longer offer its syrup brand \u201eVan de Boom\u201c in aluminium bottles, but in carton packaging from SIG. The changeover is part of the company's sustainability strategy and is being made with the support of SIG, whose carton packs are based on the packaging material \u201eSIG Terra Forest-based polymers\u201c.<\/p>\n<p>According to SIG, 95 per cent of the materials used come from renewable, forest-based sources. The raw cardboard comes from FSC-certified forests, the polymers are ISCC PLUS-certified via a mass balance system and the aluminium component is certified according to the standards of the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI).<\/p><div class=\"packa-in-post-alle\" style=\"text-align: center;\" id=\"packa-499920127\"><div id=\"packa-3792853791\"><a data-no-instant=\"1\" href=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/newsletter\/\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"a2t-link\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"PJ Self-promotion English 03\"><!--noptimize--><img src=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03.png 840w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-300x75.png 300w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-768x192.png 768w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-18x5.png 18w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-332x83.png 332w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-664x166.png 664w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-688x172.png 688w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" width=\"840\" height=\"210\"  style=\" max-width: 100%; height: auto;\" \/><!--\/noptimize--><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<h3>Reduction of the CO\u2082 footprint<\/h3>\n<p>According to a life cycle assessment by SIG, the use of the new cardboard packaging could reduce CO\u2082 emissions by up to 43 per cent compared to standard materials.<\/p>\n<p>Riedel plans to gradually switch the majority of its portfolio to carton packaging from SIG. The company has been relying on packaging with forest-based polymers since 2018 and replaced small PET bottles with SIG Smile carton packaging in 2022 - according to Riedel, with emission savings of around 75 per cent.<\/p>\n<p><em>Source:<\/em> SIG<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The company has been using packaging with forest-based polymers since 2018.","protected":false},"author":300,"featured_media":100621,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"__cvm_playback_settings":[],"__cvm_video_id":"","rank_math_description":"","rank_math_focus_keyword":"Riedel","rank_math_title":"","csco_display_header_overlay":false,"csco_singular_sidebar":"","csco_page_header_type":"","csco_page_load_nextpost":"","csco_post_video_location":[],"csco_post_video_location_hash":"","csco_post_video_url":"","csco_post_video_bg_start_time":0,"csco_post_video_bg_end_time":0,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[60659,48,31,60030,32,1487],"class_list":{"0":"post-100617","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-allgemein","8":"tag-aluminium","9":"tag-getraenke","10":"tag-nachhaltigkeit-und-green-packaging","11":"tag-niederlande","12":"tag-packmittel-und-packstoffe","13":"tag-papier-pappe-karton","14":"cs-entry","15":"cs-video-wrap"},"acf":[],"vimeo_video":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/300"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100617"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100617\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/100621"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}