{"id":110593,"date":"2026-01-06T10:01:23","date_gmt":"2026-01-06T09:01:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/?p=110593"},"modified":"2026-01-25T09:52:45","modified_gmt":"2026-01-25T08:52:45","slug":"associations-warn-against-packaging-tax-in-osnabrueck","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/verbaende-warnen-vor-verpackungssteuer-in-osnabrueck\/","title":{"rendered":"Associations warn against packaging tax in Osnabr\u00fcck"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Several business and industry associations have sharply criticised the planned introduction of a municipal packaging tax in Osnabr\u00fcck. The Bundesverband der Systemgastronomie e.V. (BdS), the Verein T\u00fcrkischer D\u00f6nerhersteller in Europa e.V. (atdid), Dehoga Niedersachsen and the Handelsverband Deutschland e.V. see considerable economic, social and bureaucratic risks in the plan and consider the tax to be unsuitable for improving urban cleanliness in the long term.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The associations emphasise that they expressly support the goal of clean cities and municipalities. However, they believe that a municipal packaging tax would not help to solve existing problems, but would instead create new challenges. These include a significant increase in bureaucratic obligations, additional financial burdens for citizens and competitive disadvantages for local businesses.<\/p>\n<p>\u201eUrban cleanliness and sustainability are key concerns of our industry. However, an additional tax is not the solution; it burdens the economy and the population in equal measure,\u201c the participating associations agree.<\/p><div class=\"packa-in-post-alle\" style=\"text-align: center;\" id=\"packa-608539453\"><div id=\"packa-4025452399\"><a data-no-instant=\"1\" href=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/newsletter\/\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"a2t-link\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"PJ Self-promotion English 03\"><!--noptimize--><img src=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03.png 840w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-300x75.png 300w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-768x192.png 768w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-18x5.png 18w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-332x83.png 332w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-664x166.png 664w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-688x172.png 688w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" width=\"840\" height=\"210\"  style=\" max-width: 100%; height: auto;\" \/><!--\/noptimize--><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<h3>Contradiction with the German government's relief targets<\/h3>\n<p>The associations are particularly critical of <a href=\"https:\/\/fraktion-gruene-os.de\/startseite\/einzelansicht-startseite-fraktion\/osnabrueck-fuehrt-kommunale-verpackungssteuer-ein\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the planned municipal initiative<\/a> against the backdrop of current federal policy initiatives. The federal government has sent out clear signals in favour of reducing bureaucracy and easing the economic burden with the so-called relief cabinet. These efforts would be counteracted by new municipal tax and reporting obligations.<\/p>\n<p>According to the associations, there is a risk that <a href=\"https:\/\/fraktion-gruene-os.de\/startseite\/einzelansicht-startseite-fraktion\/osnabrueck-fuehrt-kommunale-verpackungssteuer-ein\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a packaging tax in Osnabr\u00fcck<\/a> would have the exact opposite effect of what is being sought at federal level. Additional municipal regulation would significantly increase the administrative burden on businesses and therefore disproportionately affect smaller companies in particular.<\/p>\n<h3>Burdens for businesses and consumers<\/h3>\n<p>In addition to the bureaucratic effects, the associations warn of noticeable economic consequences. Additional fiscal requirements could put small and medium-sized companies in particular under financial pressure and weaken their competitiveness. In the long term, this could also have an impact on jobs and the diversity of local offerings.<\/p>\n<p>Socio-political aspects also play a central role in the criticism. According to the associations, prices in certain areas could increase by more than 50 per cent. These additional costs would particularly affect people on low incomes who are dependent on reasonably priced catering and retail-related services.<\/p>\n<p>\u201eA packaging tax affects those who can least afford it - economically and socially, this is the wrong approach,\u201c the joint statement reads.<\/p>\n<h3>Appeal for alternative solutions<\/h3>\n<p>Finally, the associations call on the city of Osnabr\u00fcck to work with the companies concerned to find practical alternatives. The aim must be to improve urban cleanliness and sustainability without creating additional financial and bureaucratic burdens for businesses and the population.<\/p>\n<p><em>Source:<\/em> Federal Association of System Gastronomy e.V.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The associations are particularly critical of the planned municipal initiative against the backdrop of current federal policy initiatives.","protected":false},"author":300,"featured_media":110595,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"audio","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"__cvm_playback_settings":[],"__cvm_video_id":"","rank_math_description":"Verb\u00e4nde kritisieren die geplante Verpackungssteuer in Osnabr\u00fcck und warnen vor mehr B\u00fcrokratie, h\u00f6heren Preisen und Belastungen f\u00fcr Betriebe und Verbraucher.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"Verpackungssteuer","rank_math_title":"","csco_display_header_overlay":false,"csco_singular_sidebar":"","csco_page_header_type":"","csco_page_load_nextpost":"","csco_post_video_location":[],"csco_post_video_location_hash":"","csco_post_video_url":"","csco_post_video_bg_start_time":0,"csco_post_video_bg_end_time":0,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[111],"tags":[60974,58757,38,60586,59604],"class_list":{"0":"post-110593","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-audio","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-maerkte","8":"tag-audio","9":"tag-gesetze-und-verordnungen","10":"tag-lebensmittel","11":"tag-pj_home","12":"tag-verpackungssteuer","13":"post_format-post-format-audio","14":"cs-entry","15":"cs-video-wrap"},"acf":[],"vimeo_video":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/300"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110593\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/110595"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}