{"id":116205,"date":"2026-05-13T18:01:21","date_gmt":"2026-05-13T16:01:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/?p=116205"},"modified":"2026-05-13T18:01:21","modified_gmt":"2026-05-13T16:01:21","slug":"packaging-deception-court-strengthens-consumer-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/verpackungstaeuschung-gericht-staerkt-verbraucherrechte\/","title":{"rendered":"Packaging deception: Court strengthens consumer rights"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"packa-d-billboard packa-entity-placement\" style=\"text-align: center;\" id=\"packa-1552003486\"><div id=\"packa-2463795149\"><a data-no-instant=\"1\" href=\"https:\/\/wemakepackaging.it\/en\/home\/\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"a2t-link\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210\"><!--noptimize--><img src=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210.jpg\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210.jpg 1750w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-300x75.jpg 300w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-1024x256.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-768x192.jpg 768w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-1536x384.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-18x5.jpg 18w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-332x83.jpg 332w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-664x166.jpg 664w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-688x172.jpg 688w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-1044x261.jpg 1044w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-1400x350.jpg 1400w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1777969430042_banner_ASK_TRUST_PACK_840x210-1320x330.jpg 1320w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1750px) 100vw, 1750px\" width=\"840\" height=\"210\"  style=\" max-width: 100%; height: auto;\" \/><!--\/noptimize--><\/a><\/div><\/div>\r\n<p><strong>Hidden price increases are a nuisance for many consumers. The Hamburg Consumer Centre has now achieved success in a dispute over Milka chocolate bars from manufacturer Mondelez. The Bremen Regional Court has ruled that consumers must not be deceived if products contain less content while the packaging remains the same. <\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The case began when the Hamburg Consumer Advice Centre sued Mondelez. The accusation: the filling quantity of some Milka chocolate bars was reduced from 100 to 90 grams, while the packaging remained unchanged. This change was barely noticeable to consumers, as the quantity indication was often covered by outer packaging and the indication of the new filling quantity was lost in the packaging design.<\/p>\r\n<p>The court followed the consumer advice centre's argument and found that a deception had occurred due to a so-called relative packaging trick.<\/p><div class=\"packa-in-post-alle packa-entity-placement\" style=\"text-align: center;\" id=\"packa-406912144\"><div id=\"packa-149314960\"><a data-no-instant=\"1\" href=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/newsletter\/\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"a2t-link\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"PJ Self-promotion English 03\"><!--noptimize--><img src=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03.png 840w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-300x75.png 300w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-768x192.png 768w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-18x5.png 18w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-332x83.png 332w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-664x166.png 664w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-688x172.png 688w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" width=\"840\" height=\"210\"  style=\" max-width: 100%; height: auto;\" \/><!--\/noptimize--><\/a><\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Signalling effect for the industry<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Armin Valet from the Hamburg Consumer Advice Centre emphasised the importance of the ruling: \u201eMany people reach for the Milka bars and don't realise that they're only getting 90 grams of chocolate for their money instead of 100.\u201c Valet sees the decision by the Bremen Regional Court as a strengthening of consumer rights and calls on the legislature to create further binding regulations against deceptive packaging.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Consumer reactions and consequences<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The reduction in filling quantity while keeping the packaging the same did not go unnoticed by consumers. Earlier this year, Milka chocolate was voted \u201eDeceptive Packaging of the Year 2025\u201c by consumers. Hundreds of complaints were received by the Hamburg Consumer Protection Agency. These reactions underline the growing awareness and sensitivity of consumers to hidden price increases.<\/p><div id=\"packa-2894524442\" class=\"packa-inhalt packa-entity-placement\"><!--noptimize--><script async src=\"https:\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-2686439340972671\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script>\r\n<ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;text-align:center\" data-ad-layout=\"in-article\" data-ad-format=\"fluid\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-2686439340972671\" data-ad-slot=\"6171251825\"><\/ins>\r\n<script>\r\n     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});\r\n<\/script><!--\/noptimize--><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Outlook<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The ruling by the Bremen Regional Court could have consequences for the packaging industry. Manufacturers will have to pay closer attention to how they present their products in the future in order to avoid disseminating misleading information. The decision could serve as a precedent and further fuel the discussion about transparency in packaging. The Hamburg Consumer Advice Centre sees this as an important step towards greater clarity and fairness in retail.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p><em>Source:<\/em> Consumer advice centre Hamburg<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Bremen Regional Court has ruled against Mondelez for misleading packaging on Milka chocolate bars. The decision could have far-reaching consequences for the industry.","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":106430,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"__cvm_playback_settings":[],"__cvm_video_id":"","rank_math_description":"Das Landgericht Bremen verurteilt Mondelez wegen Verpackungst\u00e4uschung bei Milka-Schokoladentafeln. Ein Pr\u00e4zedenzfall f\u00fcr Verbraucherrechte.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"Verpackungst\u00e4uschung","rank_math_title":"","csco_display_header_overlay":false,"csco_singular_sidebar":"","csco_page_header_type":"","csco_page_load_nextpost":"","csco_post_video_location":[],"csco_post_video_location_hash":"","csco_post_video_url":"","csco_post_video_bg_start_time":0,"csco_post_video_bg_end_time":0,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[111],"tags":[36,32,61257,59448],"class_list":{"0":"post-116205","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-maerkte","8":"tag-markt","9":"tag-packmittel-und-packstoffe","10":"tag-verbraucherzentrale-hamburg","11":"tag-verpackung","12":"cs-entry","13":"cs-video-wrap"},"acf":[],"vimeo_video":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116205"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116205\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":116212,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116205\/revisions\/116212"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/106430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}