{"id":41361,"date":"2021-01-25T11:45:22","date_gmt":"2021-01-25T10:45:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/?p=41361"},"modified":"2021-01-25T13:06:25","modified_gmt":"2021-01-25T12:06:25","slug":"oatly-are-you-stupid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/oatly-are-you-stupid\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201eAre you stupid?\u201c - Oatly mobilises consumers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Do consumers really need a clearer distinction between plant-based milk alternatives and animal-based dairy products at the point of sale? The oat milk producer Oatly rejects such EU efforts as paternalism and wants to mobilise consumers accordingly with the \u201eAre you stupid?\u201c initiative.<\/p>\n<p>Specifically, it is about the <strong>Amendment 171<\/strong>, which the European Parliament voted in favour of on 23 October 2020. It refers to EU Regulation No. 1308\/2013, which states that terms such as \u201emilk\u201c, \u201echeese\u201c and \u201eyoghurt\u201c may only be used to describe products that originate from animals. In future, dairy products are to be differentiated from plant-based alternatives. In a current initiative, the Swedish company is now asking provocatively <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.oatly.com\/no\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-schema-attribute=\"\">\u201eAre you stupid?\u201c<\/a><\/strong> and calls, among other things, for participation in a <a href=\"https:\/\/stopam171.com\/de\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-schema-attribute=\"\">Petition against the amendment<\/a> on.<\/p>\n<p>Founded in 1990, the Swedish company argues that the names of dairy products - such as milk and cheese - are already<strong> sufficiently protected by law<\/strong> are. The planned restrictive measures would have a significant impact on both marketing and packaging. On the one hand, there are fears that the <strong>Packaging of plant-based milk alternatives<\/strong> must be clearly differentiated from the packaging of dairy products in future. In addition, the current regulations allow plant-based products to be labelled as \u201eno milk\u201c and \u201edairy-free\u201c and \u201eyoghurt alternative\u201c. This would no longer be possible in future.<\/p><div class=\"packa-in-post-alle\" style=\"text-align: center;\" id=\"packa-174944095\"><div id=\"packa-494212711\"><a data-no-instant=\"1\" href=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/newsletter\/\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"a2t-link\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"PJ Self-promotion English 03\"><!--noptimize--><img src=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03.png 840w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-300x75.png 300w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-768x192.png 768w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-18x5.png 18w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-332x83.png 332w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-664x166.png 664w, https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PJ-Eigenwerbung-English-03-688x172.png 688w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" width=\"840\" height=\"210\"  style=\" max-width: 100%; height: auto;\" \/><!--\/noptimize--><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<h2>Oatly campaign: <strong>\u201eAre you stupid?\u201c<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The company is taking a clear stance here. A different declaration or even a necessary differentiation through a different packaging design is not necessary, as the consumer is well informed about the product.<strong> Sufficient expertise<\/strong> to recognise these differences. Various videos of the digital campaign <strong>\u201eAre you stupid?\u201c<\/strong> are intended to substantiate this. They present the responses of participants in a study of twelve focus groups with people from 17 countries aged 21-64. They were able to clearly identify plant-based products and dairy products.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe id=\"62653407\" class=\"embed-responsive-item\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube-nocookie.com\/embed\/7tkwRMbe2rU?enablejsapi=1&amp;origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wuv.de\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-248052_108=\"true\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>In addition, according to a survey conducted in collaboration with GfK, only five out of 100 participants bought a vegan product by mistake. Instead, the new regulation would make a direct comparison between plant-based products and dairy products more difficult, as comparative product information on the packaging would no longer be possible.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201eThe restrictions threatened by Amendment 171 will only make the switch to plant-based products more complicated. The amendment contradicts the mission of the farm-to-fork strategy to increase the consumption of plant-based products - in our opinion, this is absurd.\u201c <strong>Tobias Nordstr\u00f6m,<\/strong> Head of Planning, Oatly<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><em>Source: Oatly<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Oat milk producer Oatly rejects EU efforts to more clearly differentiate plant-based milk alternatives. And with its \u201eAre you stupid?\u201c initiative, it is asking consumers whether this is necessary.","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":41366,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"__cvm_playback_settings":[],"__cvm_video_id":"","rank_math_description":"Mit seiner Initiative \u201eAre you stupid?\u201c wehrt sich Hafermilch-Produzent Oatly gegen EU-Bestrebungen zur Abgrenzung von pflanzlichen Milchalternativen.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"Oatly","rank_math_title":"\u201eAre you stupid?\u201c \u2013 Oatly mobilisiert Verbraucher","csco_display_header_overlay":false,"csco_singular_sidebar":"","csco_page_header_type":"","csco_page_load_nextpost":"","csco_post_video_location":[],"csco_post_video_location_hash":"","csco_post_video_url":"","csco_post_video_bg_start_time":0,"csco_post_video_bg_end_time":0,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[38,46,32],"class_list":{"0":"post-41361","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-marketing-und-design","8":"tag-lebensmittel","9":"tag-marketing-und-design","10":"tag-packmittel-und-packstoffe","11":"cs-entry","12":"cs-video-wrap"},"acf":[],"vimeo_video":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41361","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41361"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41361\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/41366"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/packaging-journal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}